You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic

This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Do you know that if you post on /talk you'll get told to piss off back to QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 0:00)
Pages: Latest, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Back

This is a QotW answer Hexagons...
…are succeeding in driving me mildly insane – I’m currently revising organic chemistry, and you wouldn’t believe the number of bloody benzene rings that involves drawing out. I swear at some point drawing hexagons really is going to push me over the edge, and drive me to a rage-fueled hexagon-driven murderous rampage.

Within a few days just seeing a hexagon is going to bring me out in a cold sweat.

Ahem, minor rant over. Sorry, just needed to get that off my chest! Excuse me whilst I return to lurking...
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 20:22, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Hexagons
Are probably my favourite shape. But then, being a Maths teacher that shouldn't surprise people that I have a favourite shape.

By the way, it's rather quick and easy to draw a hexagon with just a compass, pencil and straight edge.
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 20:29, )
This is a QotW comment Oh,
my hexagons are a lot more haphazard than that - it's not really that I have an issue with drawing them, more the fact that there are so many of them... the point I'm at at the moment, I have to draw at least 4 or 5 hexagons for every reaction =(
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 20:34, )
This is a QotW comment .
I send my sympathies. The hexagons are worse than the ridiculously long carbon chains and having to write all those tiny 'H's.
Good luck with the revision and stuff :)
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 21:36, )
This is a QotW comment Can I confuse you
by throwing in a tetrahydrofuran molecule?

Pentagons are easier on the eye, and quicker to draw by one stroke.
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 21:50, )
This is a QotW comment err you do know
that Its perfectly acceptable to replace the hexagon with a 'Ph' don't you? as in styrene= PhCHCH2
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 21:59, )
This is a QotW comment Or
you could do as I used to do in the Bad Old Days and use a template...
(, Thu 28 Aug 2008, 22:16, )
This is a QotW comment ^
er, what?
(, Fri 29 Aug 2008, 9:48, )
This is a QotW comment Unfortunately
I can't just throw in a Ph, as it's mechanisms I'm going through, so I need to draw all the electron arrowy things all over the hexagons aswell. Still, only 8 more pages of hexagons to go, then I get the joys of carbonyls instead - yay...
(, Fri 29 Aug 2008, 10:12, )

Reply »

Pages: Latest, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1