You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 8285643

[challenge entry] Back to the future II so to speak!

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:11, archived)
# oh noes.

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:12, archived)
# bunker time

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:12, archived)
# bonking time?
WAHEY
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:13, archived)
# well why not
will be better than the french bloke i snogged on saturday
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:22, archived)
# wha?
i snogged a rather nice chap on saturday.

:D
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:23, archived)
# apparently he was having a rant
about how englishmen weren't secure in their sexuality and that frenchmen were much happier to experiment. so i played my "pissed and willing to see your challenge" and Irish blood cards to prove him half wrong.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:35, archived)
# can you keep the noise down please, we can hearing you FAILing over on /talk

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:12, archived)
# You can hear a pin drop in a firing range?

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:13, archived)
# hahahaha

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:14, archived)
# it's no bigger
use the edit button, it's next to delete
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:12, archived)
# Oh dear.
Do you want me to call you a cunt now or shall I do it in the other thread as I'm sure you'll be deleting this in a second to get the full house?

EDIT: Oh, you deleted the other one. All is forgiven.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:12, archived)
# Wow.
All these exciting people sat around waiting for people to post a pic, and then write bored critical comments. Fun fun fun.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:17, archived)
# get fucked troll

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:18, archived)
# Sorry, your riposte is so scintillating it has scorched my retina.
Try not to be so witty next time. I want to be able to read your cunt-breakingly incisive comments. Thanks.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:21, archived)
# another one
oooh, so many bored critical comments. Must be party time at your place
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:27, archived)
# I can't be arsed with you anymore.
Well done. You win the game.

YOU'RE THE GREATEST DON'T LET ANYONE TELL YOU OTHERWISE, CHAMP
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:34, archived)
# Did you delete a thread and then post an oversized picture?
Congratulations, you have ruined my life.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:13, archived)
# Mankind has clearly reached a new low.

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:14, archived)
# This has probably caused the hole in the ozone layer to grow by 1%.

Actually, why does nobody talk about the hole in the ozone layer anymore? It was the great environmental catastrophe 10 years ago, then climate change swaggers along and hogs all the headlines. Does nobody care about sunburnt penguins these days?

What's black, white and red all over? A sunburned penguin, you insensitive aerosol-spraying CUNTS!
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:18, archived)
# Well, it's difficult to scare monger if you go on about the same thing for too long.
People get immune to it. Also, I think the hole is meant to be shrinking now. It's still fucking massive though.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:20, archived)
# we stopped using cfcs in lynx etc
and it fucked off, the two may or may not have been related
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:20, archived)
# er the hole in the Arctic ozone layer
wouldn't do the penguins any harm.
(, Tue 15 Apr 2008, 0:02, archived)
# No
Unlucky for the penguins that the hole's over the Antarctic, really. With those big fur coats of theirs the polar bears wouldn't have been in any danger except overheating.
(, Tue 15 Apr 2008, 0:06, archived)
# Oh dear
I recommend immediate suicide! There's a spare spot next to Paddington Station
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:15, archived)
# TOPICLOL

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:16, archived)
# Your picture is quite entertaining.
A little on the large side, but not insanely so.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:19, archived)
# Large?
What are you on, dial-up? Try moving your head back from the screen a little.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:22, archived)
# It's the file size that's the issue.
And the old 'dial up' card isn't endearing to the many people who have capped bandwidth and for those people who visit here from foreign countries without speedy internet access.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:23, archived)
# whaaat!
My advice would be to not visit an image based website. I've been all over the world, and from Paraguay to Nepal they have broadband. So it takes a minute to download a few images, make up a cup of tea for godsake.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:26, archived)
# That's a lot of cups of tea if everyone posts large images.
It's just about not making images bigger than they need to be, yours would be perfectly legible at under 50k.
There's no need to get arsey about it.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:28, archived)
# I'm not being arsey, i just don't care.
It needed to be that size to fit the hilarious witty type on. Anyway, masturbation and sleep beckon, enough of this twaddle.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:31, archived)
# In that order, I hope.
It's always embarrassing to wake up with sticky sheets.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:33, archived)
# The board holds 15 threads. 15 times 150 kilobytes equals 2.25Mb.
Not to mention the fact that many threads feature other images, all of which add up.

Having broadband is not the issue. But you'd know that from the reply above. That's if you can read.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:31, archived)
# still don't care
night xxx
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:33, archived)
# Haha, your sarcasm detector's fucked.
You interpreted a sarcastic comment as a genuine one, then a genuine comment as sarcasm.

Still images are recommended to be kept under 50kb, animations under 250kb. See the FAQ, etc.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:24, archived)
# That horse is a hooligan.

(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:13, archived)
#
that horse is clearly running (trotting or something) and the cart has no movement please add radial blur to the wheels right this second please.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:17, archived)
# No, it's running on the spot
because the cart's too heavy. It needs little puffs of dust around its feet, instead.
(, Mon 14 Apr 2008, 23:25, archived)