You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 8234494

[challenge entry] oops

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 7:15, archived)
# Oh dear god
even as a child he still looks creepy
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 7:16, archived)
# Sorry to TJ
If there was a unversity of irrelivant I think I'd be the don. Have you ever wondered the history of your phone number? My folks had the same one for about 30 years and Isometimes wonder who has it now.
Also I'm slightly apprehensive as I got hammered last night and think I ended up on b3ta at somew point and there's two unread messages in my inbox:P

EDIT: Could have been worst. One from rob and one suggesting Happytoast and myself have and a lovechild.
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 9:21, archived)
# GO FUCK YOURSELF!

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 7:38, archived)
# Haha

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:56, archived)
# Thankyou,
last time I replied with that same comment to a /shop of a priest with a babies face I had to explain in intricate detail as to what my comment actually meant over 3 more posts.
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 9:20, archived)
# If you were a paedophile and you got caught wanking over photographs of yourself naked as a child could you get done for it?

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:00, archived)
# yes

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:02, archived)
# why?

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:03, archived)
# what about if you gave pictures of yourself as a child to a paedophile with a letter of confirmation that he was allowed to have then.

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:06, archived)
# what about if you went back in time and had sex with yourself as a baby?

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:06, archived)
# hahahahahaha
or went back in time and lurked about somewhere that you knew that your past self would be on your own then show yourself your own cock.
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:10, archived)
# hhahahahahhahahahahahaha
"One day,this will be yours"
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:15, archived)
# *BOING!*

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 9:00, archived)
# its still wanking over a child
shirley?
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:07, archived)
# tossing over a picture of yourself as a kiddy
is hardly exploitation or nonconsensual so how could it be illegal?
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:37, archived)
# they could probably find a law or something
Its clearly just wrong

or you would get sectioned at least
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:39, archived)
# that's narcissism not paedophilia

(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:09, archived)
# that's what I thought.
Right, I'm off to work. Have fun everyone!
(, Sun 30 Mar 2008, 8:10, archived)